Fostering the uptake
of Open Science 
in Europe




OSCARS brings together world-class European Research Infrastructures (RIs) in the ESFRI roadmap and beyond to foster the uptake of Open Science in Europe.

Such RIs are part of the five Science Clusters (Humanities and Social Sciences, Life Sciences, Environmental Sciences, Photon and Neutron Science, Astronomy, Nuclear and Particle Physics), which have strived to make open data easily accessible to the users and the public, by providing FAIR data management policies and practices for enabling Open Science.

Today, the Science Clusters are an integral part of the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC) initiative and, through OSCARS, will further contribute to its development and implementation process.


In collaboration with

Science Clusters


Our mission

OSCARS aims to further consolidate past achievements of the Science Clusters into lasting interdisciplinary FAIR data services and working practices.

Through a cascading grant mechanism, a broad range of research communities will be involved for the development of new, innovative Open Science projects, that together will drive the uptake of FAIR-data-intensive research throughout the European Research Area (ERA).

OSCARS will thus give an opportunity for inter-cluster cross-adoption and co-development of services that will be part of the EOSC Exchange portfolio.

Through OSCARS community-based Competence Centres will be established and operated, virtual research environments will be deployed fostering the alignment of practices in scientific data analysis. Both objectives will contribute to consolidate the role of the clusters as thematic "EOSC Science Cluster Nodes.



The five Science Clusters of research infrastructures

Life Science

Cascading-grant open calls

To support the research communities to take up open science and foster the involvement of scientists in EOSC, OSCARS will launch two Open Calls (in total worth about 16 million Euro) to select third-parties for the development of new, innovative Open Science projects or services, that together will drive the uptake of FAIR-data-intensive research throughout the European Research Area (ERA). Projects can be proposed in the field of any of the Science Clusters by any researcher, or group of researchers, through a cascading grant mechanism. The first Open Call will be launched in March 2024

The organisation and management of the cascading grant calls, together with the mentoring and training activities that the Science Clusters will ensure in OSCARS, participate in performing excellent science and pursuing societal benefits by leveraging an Open Research approach.
By the end of the project, it is expected that a series of valuable scientific demonstrators will be available, and will further consolidate the deployment of thematic EOSC Science Clusters Nodes in the long term.

More info about the open calls


Total funding: ~€16.4 million EUR 
Funding per project: Between €100,000 to €250,000 (lump sum). 
Potential maximum of funded projects: 162
Target user communities: Science Clusters and wider community (RIs, Universities, Institutes, either consortia, or individual researchers)
Open calls launch: 1st call – March 2024; 2nd call – November 2024. Both calls will stay open for 60 days.
Time for projects’ implementation: 12-to-24 months (after signature of a Third-Party Project Agreement – TPPA)
Start of the projects: Within 4 months from TPPA signature (to give organisations time to hire staff if needed)

Download the guidelines in pdf format

Selection of proposals to be funded (max. 60 days)

Proposals will be evaluated by an Independent Evaluation Committee – IEC, which will be composed of top scientists, experts in FAIR data science and representatives of the European research communities. The IEC will evaluate eligible proposals that will have been submitted, rank them and propose a sample for fundin (that is expected within two months after the Open Call is closed).. 

The IEC’s ranking list and funding recommendation will be forwarded to the Project Management Board – PMB, who will verify and confirm that the evaluation process has been carried out in full transparency and in accordance with EC rules. 

Funding is then provided after successful conclusion of a Third-Party Project Agreement.

Project monitoring

The consortia will request a periodic “formal communication” via the OSCARS Grants Platform (area reserved to proposing Organisations) and monitoring of progress will be performed by the Consortium.

End of project

Two months after the end of the funded projects, each project will be asked to present its results and an “Open Science direct or indirect impact assessment” in a document. They will also need to present their outcomes at the Final OSCARS Assessment Conference, to enable the EC, scientific communities, as well as the EOSC Association, to discover and select high impact projects, or projects with a high potential for further upscaling, or for inspiring new paths.

Proposal guidelines

In the following, the guidelines of the OSCARS open calls for open science projects and/or services through a cascading grant mechanism are explained.

  • Length: max 10 pages, to be submitted online via a web-form on the OSCARS website
  • Language of the proposal: English

Download the guidelines in pdf format

Proposals’ structure
  • Proposal Title and Acronym
  • Open Science/Data FAIRNESS challenge(s): Open science project / open science service / industry cooperation / citizen science / main RI concerned / cross-domain / cross-RI / cross-domain / other (specify)
  • Domain: 1. Astrophysics, cosmology, particle or nuclear physics, 2. Social sciences and humanities, 3. Photon/neutron sources-based experimental research, 4. Life sciences, 5. Earth and environmental sciences, 6. Other (specify)
  • Consortium composition: Coordinator and partners (organisation name, short name and PIC number, organisation type, contact person name and email).
  • Duration and Financial support: Number of PMs requested, personnel costs requested, other costs (consumables, travel), total.
  • Project Public Summary (max. 5000 characters incl. spaces): It should contain the main objectives, as well as a brief explanation of the breakthrough character of the project as compared to the state of the art.
  • Project description (max. 4000 characters incl. spaces): Scientific and innovation objectives. Where applicable, specify whether the proposed Open Science project and/or service will leverage, or expect to integrate, the services and the Open Science environments built by the Science Clusters, for a specific ESFRI or another RI. Explain if the project is in support of scientific objectives or implementation plans of an ESFRI or other world-class RI (in that case, provide an acknowledgement / endorsement from the management of the concerned RI). 
    Describe also how the envisioned results could benefit the scientific community at large, European society and/or the European Research Area. Explain which questions of high societal relevance and/or excellence research will be addressed or facilitated by it.
    Evaluation questions:
    1. Is the “FAIRness” or “openness” character of the proposed scientific project or service adequately and clearly explained?
    2. Are the project proposal aims and objectives adequately and clearly defined and explained?
    3. Is the contribution to or the leverage of the Science Cluster work programme clearly explained?
    4. Is the relevance to ESFRI and other RIs of the proposed scientific project or service adequately addressed?
  • Scientific impacts (max. 4000 characters incl. spaces): Describe how the project objectives will extend the scientific knowledge in the concerned domain compared to the current situation. Explain how the project engages or would potentially engage, thanks to its results, with a large scientific community or multiple research communities (academic and industry, as well as citizen scientists and the “long-tail” of science). If applicable explain the capacity to support an ESFRI RI and/or extend beyond the RI communities involved in the H2020 science clusters. 
    Evaluation questions:
    1. Is the scientific project and/or the service development proposed clearly going beyond the state of the art? 
    2. Is the potential large scientific impact adequately explained?
    3. Is the expected impact of the proposed project on an ESFRI RI or on multiple RIs, or its capacity to engage through the Science Clusters with multiple RIs clearly illustrated?
  • Digital resources (max. 4000 characters incl. spaces): Describe how the project pilots the use of data and services already on-boarded to the Science Clusters Open Science platforms and/or to the EOSC platform and/or bring new research digital objects and RI services to the EOSC Exchange. Illustrate, if applicable, the technological innovation potential of the proposed project and the capacity to strengthen the multi-domain/multi-competences cross-fertilization and/or training. Describe in detail the expected needs in terms of computing resources.
    Evaluation questions:
    1. Is the proposed project adequately referencing the Science Clusters’ platforms?
    2. Are the digital resources required, and/or the connection to EOSC services envisaged, clearly identified?
  • Project Implementation, Budget Breakdown and Final Deliverables (max. 20000 characters incl. spaces): Describe how the project will be implemented (steps) within the course of its duration. Also provide an indicative budget breakdown (personnel costs, travel, equipment, other...) for the requested funding. Include a table of expected results at mid-term and at the end of the project. Please pay special attention to include deliverables that guarantee a sufficient open dissemination of the project results, as well as ensure that the project will contribute to accelerate the uptake of RI and EOSC resources (data, services, policies, interoperability framework, etc.). 
    All digital research data generated by the project will be deposited in a trusted repository federated in the EOSC in compliance with EOSC requirements.
    The applicants must commit to provide, for public dissemination, at the OSCARS final (or dedicated) event in Brussels the following deliverables:

    • A final project summary in PDF format of maximum 5000 characters, including spaces.
    • A presentation
    • A “scientific journal or journal-type” article summarising the main project results and methodology used to achieve them.

    Evaluation questions:

    1. Are the project implementation steps concrete and well explained?
    2. Are the anticipated results achievable with the implementation steps put in place and in the suggested timeframe?
    3. Does the budget breakdown correspond to the presented implementation steps and is it reasonable?
    4. Does the proposal adequately commit to EOSC compliance and openness of its results?
FAQs - Frequently Asked Questions

Q: If ‘target community’ is to be read as ‘potential applicant’: how about non legal entities such as science clusters and individual researchers? How can they apply if you need a PIC code?
A: Individual researchers or a group of researchers in different countries of the EU +Associated Countries can apply with their own affiliation (a university or a research institute). A Science Cluster by itself cannot apply but it could endorse a project led by a PI and his/her affiliation, who would assume the direct responsibility of the proposed project.

Q: If ‘target community’ is something else (e.g. potential users of the envisaged results), then where do we specify who can be a ‘potential applicant’?
A: Target users are the potential applicants as well as the target audience towards whom disseminate the information of the call.

Q: Is the eligibility assessment checking admin aspects only (such as budget height, duration)?
A: Yes, including eligibility to access EU funding. However please note that third parties receiving financial support are not subject to the rules on eligibility for funding provided in Article 23 of the HE Regulation. At the same time we draw your attention to 13. General Annexes to the Work Programme 2023-2024, p. 8, which excludes entities subject to EU restrictive measures as well as legal entities established in Russia, Belarus, or in non-government controlled territories of Ukraine from receiving financial support to third parties.

Q: If not what are the other eligibility criteria?
A: One more aspect, but that could also be verified after the ranking is completed, is an endorsement for the proposed project from the Science Clusters or an ESFRI Research Infrastructure (RI). Without an accompanying letter, we would contact their references for confirmation.

Q: What are the eligibility criteria? Do the usual HE criteria apply, only participants from member states and associated countries can receive funding?
A: No, HE criteria do not apply for the Cascading Grant.

Q: Do we have to submit regular technical reports?
A: There is no formal technical report to be submitted but we request a periodic “formal communication” via the OSCARS Grants Platform (area reserved to proposing Organisations) and monitoring of progress will be performed by the Consortium. The applicants must commit to provide, for public dissemination, at the OSCARS final (or dedicated) event in Brussels the following deliverables:

  • A final project summary in PDF format of maximum 5000 characters, including spaces.
  • A presentation 
  • A “scientific journal or journal-type” article summarising the main project results and methodology used to achieve them.

Q: Do we have to submit a financial report?
A: There is no finance report required. The funding will be provided in form of a lump-sum.

Q: When will we receive the funding?
A: 85% of the total funding will be paid out at the start of the project, after signature of the Third-Party Project Agreement (TPPA). The remaining 15% will be paid after the final deliverables have been provided.
Please be aware that EC funding rules apply (see also the EC's Horizon Europe Model Grant Agreement).

Q: Will there be a contract/agreement that needs to be signed and who is signing it?
A: Yes, there will be a so-called Third-Party Project Agreement (TPPA) that sets out the details of the funding regulations. It will be signed by the coordinator of OSCARS at CNRS-LAPP and the lead organisation of the funded project.

Q: What is the maximum time to implement the funded projects and do we need to start immediately after the signature of the TPPA? 
A: Project duration can be between 1 and 2 years. They need to start at the latest 4 months after the signature of the TPPA. This time is meant to be used for recruitment or other necessary preparations for the project.